WAR

^Ever heard of "Does not work"?

"ok they bombed us, lets negotiate!" - Fail.

Advertisement

Because of greed, better resources and sometimes because of one idiot...

War was first made for land (a goodish reason)

Then religion became the reason for war

Then people wanted power so had wars

Then people wanted fuel and resources, so started wars

Now countries wanted to look poerful and tough, so they start wars with countries without enough money or power to pose a real threat.

So why is there war?

Because people are so stupid that they think the only way to solve something iss to start war, people dying for no reason. The U.K go to war to follow the USA, and the USA govenment has started wars for no good reasons. And the only thing holding back from Russia is they KNOW they'll LOSE. There are two main armys on this planet. U.S.A (which includes UK because the Labour Party's a scapegoat to the USA), and Russia. Soon that war WILL happen then all UK will be bombed by Russia to destroy americas nukes on the british isles. Then they'll be decades of russia against USA, with china and japan fightng, and all the other countries will have to pick sides. But in the end one countrie will have won, but what will they have won? The right to say they killed billions of people? The right to say they destroyed the planet? Because that s the only outcome of World War Three.

bendiebob1 you are an idiot. Read my other posts, damnit. I'm sick of telling people like you off that know nothing about WHY there are wars. People dont go to war over fuel and resources, we got bombed, you tard.

Most wars are caused because of fear, I think. Fear of the unknown.
Fear of not having safety.
Fear of others who pose a potential threat.

Our war that we're in now is fueled by fear, imo.
It is proven that most of the terrorists that destroyed the Twin Towers were from Saudi Arabia.
So why did we invade Afghanistan? Yes, Osama bin Laden was thought to have been a part of 9/11. But no, Al Qaeda did not cause 9/11.
Al Qaeda's not even in Saudi Arabia.
We have evidence that Iraq did not have anything to do with 9/11.
So why did we invade there?
But George W. Bush decided to invade for fear that they have nuclear weapons, which we now know that they don't have.
And now we're stuck in this mess. >.<

infinitesilence wrote: Most wars are caused because of fear, I think. Fear of the unknown.
Fear of not having safety.
Fear of others who pose a potential threat.

Our war that we're in now is fueled by fear, imo.
It is proven that most of the terrorists that destroyed the Twin Towers were from Saudi Arabia.
So why did we invade Afghanistan? Yes, Osama bin Laden was thought to have been a part of 9/11. But no, Al Qaeda did not cause 9/11.
Al Qaeda's not even in Saudi Arabia.
We have evidence that Iraq did not have anything to do with 9/11.
So why did we invade there?
But George W. Bush decided to invade for fear that they have nuclear weapons, which we now know that they don't have.
And now we're stuck in this mess. >.<

Osama was actually (and still is) the leader of the gorup that caused 9/11, which was planned, and is al qaeda.
Stop blaming Bush for everything, he's a figurehead, its the people who decide to go to war;
*Representatives
*House of Reps (yes, its different)
*Senate
*Congress

President: Can declare war, veto, and make speeches. That's basically it.

Nexus wrote:

infinitesilence wrote: Most wars are caused because of fear, I think. Fear of the unknown.
Fear of not having safety.
Fear of others who pose a potential threat.

Our war that we're in now is fueled by fear, imo.
It is proven that most of the terrorists that destroyed the Twin Towers were from Saudi Arabia.
So why did we invade Afghanistan? Yes, Osama bin Laden was thought to have been a part of 9/11. But no, Al Qaeda did not cause 9/11.
Al Qaeda's not even in Saudi Arabia.
We have evidence that Iraq did not have anything to do with 9/11.
So why did we invade there?
But George W. Bush decided to invade for fear that they have nuclear weapons, which we now know that they don't have.
And now we're stuck in this mess. >.<

Osama was actually (and still is) the leader of the gorup that caused 9/11, which was planned, and is al qaeda.
Stop blaming Bush for everything, he's a figurehead, its the people who decide to go to war;
*Representatives
*House of Reps (yes, its different)
*Senate
*Congress

President: Can declare war, veto, and make speeches. That's basically it.

I know Osama's the leader.
I'm not blaming Bush for everything. I just think it was quite insensible to go into Afghanistan two months after the Twin Towers were destroyed.
I understand the severity of this situation, but I wish the government would've made a rigid plan before rushing into the Middle East.
As far as Iraq goes, though, I still think it's wrong for them to have invaded there.
And if it's the people, why the hell are they complaining about the war?
That's quite hypocritical.
As you said, Osama is responsible(sorry for my mistake), so what tied Iraq into this whole situation?

Actually we were organized, at first.
With all the bombing runs and strategies.

Then Iraq came into play with the other guy that we caught in a hole. They were killing off innocent people and blah blah, so Iraq has terrorists too and we invaded for that reason. We even killed a major terrorist group in Iraq by sending a bomb straight into their house.

I know someone who served in Iraq, the job isn't done.

As for the people that complain about war, its the same tards that bitch at you to go green, then smash and light cars on fire.

Nexus wrote: Actually we were organized, at first.
With all the bombing runs and strategies.

Then Iraq came into play with the other guy that we caught in a hole. They were killing off innocent people and blah blah, so Iraq has terrorists too and we invaded for that reason. We even killed a major terrorist group in Iraq by sending a bomb straight into their house.

I know someone who served in Iraq, the job isn't done.

As for the people that complain about war, its the same tards that bitch at you to go green, then smash and light cars on fire.

Lulz.
Thanks for clearing up my misunderstanding. [:

"He who joyfully marches to music rank and file, has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice. This disgrace to civilization should be done away with at once. Heroism at command, how violently I hate all this, how despicable and ignoble war is; I would rather be torn to shreds than be a part of so base an action. It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder." - Albert Einstein

rawwrr wrote: "He who joyfully marches to music rank and file, has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice. This disgrace to civilization should be done away with at once. Heroism at command, how violently I hate all this, how despicable and ignoble war is; I would rather be torn to shreds than be a part of so base an action. It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder." - Albert Einstein

He was clever weren't he

A pity you didn't follow in his footsteps. *He was clever wasn't he.

War is necessary. Regardless of rhyme or reason, it is an effective method of depopulating the planet. Imagine how many more people there would be if the eleven million people that died in the holocaust had ALL had children. Imagine roughly 2 children per person. That's 22 million. Imagine they had children. That's 44 million. That's not including every person that died during actual campaigns. Granted, the statistics wouldn't be those exact ones, due to things such as impotency, because most people smoked during that period of time, etcetera etcetera.

Tl;dr: Stop breathing, there's not enough space.

The only thread I could fin was on the second to last page of this forum.

Your thoughts on war?

Link