Incest

PoptartsBleedJellyNoMore wrote: I read several stories on this.
A couple in the UK been together for a while now completely in love, but learn the truth.
They be long lost brother & sister, so they have been banned, by court, the right to have sex together.

Honestly. What ever floats you're boat. Love who you want.
But it does lead to complications.

OIHHHH...Poor themmm( ;_ ; ) Like a Love Storiesss...

But I agree with.If da sister and brother ahve SEX and ot a BABY...I think their baby should be Down.SynDrome :S That's worse tahn Can't be lover...U must Care who will birth on EARTH and must living on thsi Earth after U !

umm..About ENgland Empire..yep, they had married ppl who has their same blood...but yeah, they got disease from their Gene..umm..' Hymophilia '.. if u've cut by sth. ur blood will not stop so easily...What this disease call ?

Advertisement

JINSN wrote:

PoptartsBleedJellyNoMore wrote: I read several stories on this.
A couple in the UK been together for a while now completely in love, but learn the truth.
They be long lost brother & sister, so they have been banned, by court, the right to have sex together.

Honestly. What ever floats you're boat. Love who you want.
But it does lead to complications.

OIHHHH...Poor themmm( ;_ ; ) Like a Love Storiesss...

But I agree with.If da sister and brother ahve SEX and ot a BABY...I think their baby should be Down.SynDrome :S That's worse tahn Can't be lover...U must Care who will birth on EARTH and must living on thsi Earth after U !

umm..About ENgland Empire..yep, they had married ppl who has their same blood...but yeah, they got disease from their Gene..umm..' Hymophilia '.. if u've cut by sth. ur blood will not stop so easily...What this disease call ?

a hymophiliac is when their blood doesnt clot properly to stop the bleeding then they would have to go to a hospital to get a shot so it can stop. and all hymophiliacs live in pain.

How is it that people want to define marriage?
How close is "too closely" related?

I know some of ppl like that kind...Brother married with his Sister and reason is..really Stupid, Crazy, unbelievable O_o

they married because thay dun want their treasure and all their money has gone to other hands ! Because They're Really rich..and yeah ! Rich guys always has trouble with thiefs or mafias or girls that want to married them because they only want their money..especially they can't trust ppl liked ordinary ppl do...

JINSN wrote: I know some of ppl like that kind...Brother married with his Sister and reason is..really Stupid, Crazy, unbelievable O_o

they married because thay dun want their treasure and all their money has gone to other hands ! Because They're Really rich..and yeah ! Rich guys always has trouble with thiefs or mafias or girls that want to married them because they only want their money..especially they can't trust ppl liked ordinary ppl do...

They marry their relatives because they don't want their treasure?
Makes perfect sense.

DevilOfParadise wrote:
How close is "too closely" related?

For procreation, anything closer than a third cousin is getting into dodgy territory

Effy wrote: anything closer than a third cousin is getting into dodgy territory

I never quite understood the Cousin thing.

PoptartsBleedJellyNoMore wrote:

Effy wrote: anything closer than a third cousin is getting into dodgy territory

I never quite understood the Cousin thing.

What don't you understand?

PoptartsBleedJellyNoMore wrote:

Effy wrote: anything closer than a third cousin is getting into dodgy territory

I never quite understood the Cousin thing.

Effy wrote:

PoptartsBleedJellyNoMore wrote:

Effy wrote: anything closer than a third cousin is getting into dodgy territory

I never quite understood the Cousin thing.

What don't you understand?

On which boundaries is it unacceptable to be 'involved' with your cousin.

DevilOfParadise wrote:

And the whole 'removed cousin' thing..

PoptartsBleedJellyNoMore wrote:

Effy wrote:

PoptartsBleedJellyNoMore wrote:

Effy wrote: anything closer than a third cousin is getting into dodgy territory

I never quite understood the Cousin thing.

What don't you understand?

On which boundaries is it unacceptable to be 'involved' with your cousin.

Well like I said, when it comes to having children the more distant the relative is the better. The gene pool is diluted and it lowers the risk of passing on a genetic disease.
Like say colour blindness runs in the family, and all the members of the family are colour blind -even though it's a recessive gene. If two closely related cousins were to have a child, the child would definitely be colour blind also.
But if two distantly related cousins (lets say third cousin) were to have a child, there would be much less chance of the child being colour blind. This is because in the genes are being diluted down in each new generation, which means your third cousin would either be a carrier for the colour blindness gene, or just not have it at all. So the child's chances of becoming colour blind go from being 100% to a 50% if they're a carrier, and a 0% if they're not a carrier.

Sorry if that's confusing, some monohybrid crosses would probably explain it better...

PoptartsBleedJellyNoMore wrote:
And the whole 'removed cousin' thing..

That's just how your cousin's child relates back to you. If you had a kid, your first cousin once removed would be your kid's second cousin

Effy wrote:
Well like I said, when it comes to having children the more distant the relative is the better. The gene pool is diluted and it lowers the risk of passing on a genetic disease.
Like say colour blindness runs in the family, and all the members of the family are colour blind -even though it's a recessive gene. If two closely related cousins were to have a child, the child would definitely be colour blind also.
But if two distantly related cousins (lets say third cousin) were to have a child, there would be much less chance of the child being colour blind. This is because in the genes are being diluted down in each new generation, which means your third cousin would either be a carrier for the colour blindness gene, or just not have it at all. So the child's chances of becoming colour blind go from being 100% to a 50% if they're a carrier, and a 0% if they're not a carrier.

Sorry if that's confusing, some monohybrid crosses would probably explain it better...

So, third cousin and closer, the chances of carrying and passing on a specific gene becomes higher. More chances of birth defects, diseases, abnormalities. But at least within the family, you'll know the chances, if there's any problems that might occur to the offspring that could be untreatable or fatal, but maybe knowing is not better.

Well, I won't be worrying about that now or anytime soon.

Effy wrote:
That's just how your cousin's child relates back to you. If you had a kid, your first cousin once removed would be your kid's second cousin

Oh,I understand it now. Thanks for putting it in words I can understand.

oh well. love is love. i guess?

BUT NO. NOT FOR ME. I HAVE TWO YOUNGER BROTHERS. I CANNOT BARE THE THOUGHT OF THEM... OR ME NEITHER... >mm<